Lyons v. Michael & Associates

Federal Debt Collection Practices Act’s one-year statute of limitations began to run when debtor discovered (or reasonably should have discovered) that a collections suit was filed against her—not when the suit was actually filed.  Discovery rule tolling applies to the FDCPA’s one-year statute of limitations.  Mangum v. Action Collection Service, Inc., 575 F.3d 935 (9th Cir. 2009).  Here, plaintiff sued based on defendant’s having filed a collection action in a county where the contract was not made and she did not live.  Because plaintiff discovered the suit only when it was served on her, the limitations period began to run at that time, not the earlier date on which the collection action complaint was filed.  Naas v. Stolman, 130 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 1997) does not hold to the contrary.  Discovery rule tolling was not raised in that case.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Nguyen, J.); June 8, 2016; 2016 WL 3192623

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s