Yhudai v. Impac Funding Corp.

A borrower lacks standing to sue alleging his loan was transferred to a securitized trust after its closing date because a late transfer is voidable, not void.  Following Saterbak v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 808, but with more extensive reasoning, this decision holds that a borrower has no standing to sue over a post-closing date transfer of his loan into a New York securitized trust because such a transfer is merely voidable, not void under New York law.  Glaski v. Bank of America, N.A. (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1079 reached the wrong, contrary result by relying on the trial court decision in Erobobo which has since been reversed and uniformly criticized.

California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 1 (Rothschild, P.J.); July 29, 2016; Case No. B262509



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s