Dang v. Maruichi American Corp.

The National Labor Relations Act did not preempt a manager’s state law wrongful termination claims, as his termination did not arguably interfere with employees’ right to organize—they had already voted to join a union when the manager was fired for goading them into unionizing.  A maintenance manager’s wrongful termination suit was not preempted by the NLRA since that act does not arguably protect or prohibit firing managers unless the firing directly interferes with the rights of statutorily protected, non-managerial employees.  Here, there was no showing of such interference.  Dang was supposedly terminated for his ill treatment of subordinates which led to their unionizing, but the workers had already voted for the union before Dang was terminated, so his firing didn’t interfere with their rights, and the NLRA therefore did not preempt Dang’s wrongful termination suit.

California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2 (Boren, P.J.); September 1, 2016 (published September 22, 2016); 2016 WL 5272661


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s