Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hospital

So long as the notice of intention to move for a new trial is timely filed, the trial court may, in its discretion, consider late-filed affidavits supporting the motion. While the timely filing of a notice of intention to move for a new trial is jurisdictional—the trial court lacks jurisdiction to grant a new trial if the notice is untimely—the timely filing of supporting affidavits, while mandatory, is not jurisdictional.  So the trial court may consider the untimely affidavits and grant a new trial so long as the notice itself was timely.  Here, the defendant did not object to the untimeliness of the affidavits in the trial court and so waived that issue for purposes of its appeal from the new trial order.  The decision disapproves Erikson v. Weiner (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 1663 which held to the contrary.

California Supreme Court (Liu, J.); January 19, 2017; 2017 WL 218033

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s