Jones v. Whisenand

A convicted criminal defendant need not demonstrate actual innocence in order to sue his attorney for malpractice in connection with civil commitment proceedings under the Sexually Violent Predator Act.  A convicted criminal defendant need not prove his actual innocence in order to sue his attorney for malpractice in connection with civil commitment proceedings under the Sexually Violent Predator Act.  Every person subject to the Act has been convicted.  To require proof of actual innocence would virtually preclude a suit for malpractice in the course of a Sexually Violent Predator Act proceeding.  Nothing in the act, which is highly punitive enough as it is, indicates a legislative intent to deprive defendants of the ability to sue their lawyers for malpractice.

California Court of Appeal, Third District (Renner, J.); February 10, 2017; 2017 WL 543329

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s