Haniff v. Superior Court

A California state court cannot compel a party to undergo a vocational rehabilitation examination by the opposing party’s expert. California’s Discovery Act does not authorize a court to compel a plaintiff to undergo a vocational rehabilitation examination by the defendant’s vocational expert even when the plaintiff claims lost wages saying he is unable to work due to injuries suffered in the accident.  California courts may not order discovery other than that authorized by statute.  The Discovery Act allows medical and mental examinations, but not vocational rehabilitation examinations. 

California Court of Appeal, Sixth District (Bamattre-Manoukian, J.); March 1, 2017; 2017 WL 786464

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s