Jones v. Royal Administration Services, Inc.

An advertiser bears vicarious liability for a telemarketer’s Telephone Consumer Protection Act violations, if the telemarketer was an agent rather than an independent contractora question resolved under federal common law by applying the 10-factor Restatement of Agency test.  An advertiser bears vicarious liability for its telemarketer’s TCPA violations only if the telemarketer is an agent rather than an independent contractor.  Agency status is determined under federal common law, which this decision holds is guided by the 10-factor test set out in Rest.2d Agency 220(2).  Here, applying that test, the telemarketer was an independent contractor since the advertiser exercised little control over the manner in which and to whom the telemarketer made calls, only approving scripts the telemarketer was to follow once the call was placed and the recipient expressed interest in the type of service contract that the advertiser offered for sale.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Smith, N.R., J.); August 9, 2017; 2017 WL 3401317

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s